|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, Vol. 13, No. 3,
172-183 (1995)
DOI: 10.1177/0887302X9501300304
Construction of An SI Theory of Fashion: Part 1. Ambivalence and Change
Susan B. Kaiser
Division of Textiles and Clothing, University of California, Davis, CA 95616
Richard H. Nagasawa
Department of Sociology, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287-2101
Sandra S. Hutton
Department of Design, Merchandising and Consumer Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523
In this first part of a three-part series explaining fashion as a social process, a symbolic interactionist (SI) theory is presented to explain why appearance styles continue to emerge, be adopted and change. Unlike existing theories that tend to explain how a particular style diffuses through a social system, this theory draws on SI and extracts underlying concepts that, we propose, instigate and perpetuate changes in appearance styles: ambivalence, symbolic ambiguity, and negotiation. Five principles and associated theoretical statements are developed to explain fashion in general, followed by a more specific look at transitional cultural contexts, using the contemporary, U.S. context for the purpose of illustration.
Key Words: fashion symbolic interaction postmodern ambivalence theory

CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
N. Palomo-Lovinski
Extensible Dress: The Future of Digital Clothing
Clothing and Textiles Research Journal,
April 1, 2008;
26(2):
119 - 130.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. L. Pedersen
Theory Is Everywhere: A Discourse on Theory
Clothing and Textiles Research Journal,
January 1, 2007;
25(1):
106 - 128.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Cosbey, M. L. Damhorst, and J. Farrell-Beck
Diversity of Daytime Clothing Styles as a Reflection of Women's Social Role Ambivalence from 1873 through 1912
Clothing and Textiles Research Journal,
June 1, 2003;
21(3):
101 - 119.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. A. Morgado
From Kitsch to Chic: The Transformation of Hawaiian Shirt Aesthetics
Clothing and Textiles Research Journal,
March 1, 2003;
21(2):
75 - 88.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. P. Ogle and M. Eckman
Dress-Related Responses to the Columbine Shootings: Other-Imposed and Self-Designed
Family and Consumer Sciences Research Journal,
December 1, 2002;
31(2):
155 - 194.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. Huun and S. B. Kaiser
The Emergence of Modern Infantwear, 1896-1962: Traditional White Dresses Succumb to Fashion's Gender Obsession
Clothing and Textiles Research Journal,
January 1, 2001;
19(3):
103 - 119.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. M. Fiore and J. P. Ogle
Facilitating Students' Integration of Textiles and Clothing Subject Matter Part One: Dimensions of a Model and a Taxonomy
Clothing and Textiles Research Journal,
January 1, 2000;
18(1):
31 - 45.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. S. Buckland
Fashion as a Tool of World War II: A Case Study Supporting the SI Theory
Clothing and Textiles Research Journal,
January 1, 2000;
18(3):
140 - 151.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. Henderson and M. DeLong
Dress in a Postmodern Era: An Analysis of Aesthetic Expression and Motivation
Clothing and Textiles Research Journal,
January 1, 2000;
18(4):
237 - 250.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. J. Lennon, K. K. P. Johnson, and T. L. Schulz
Forging Linkages between Dress and Law in the U.S., Part I: Rape and Sexual Harassment
Clothing and Textiles Research Journal,
January 1, 1999;
17(3):
144 - 156.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Laughlin
A Series of Response Papers
Clothing and Textiles Research Journal,
January 1, 1997;
15(3):
162 - 163.
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. A. Hamilton
The Macro-Micro Interface in the Construction of Individual Fashion Forms and Meanings
Clothing and Textiles Research Journal,
January 1, 1997;
15(3):
164 - 171.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. C. Kean
The Role of the Fashion System in Fashion Change: A Response to the Kaiser, Nagasawa and Hutton Model
Clothing and Textiles Research Journal,
January 1, 1997;
15(3):
172 - 177.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. K. Pannabecker
Fashioning Theory: A Critical Discussion of the Symbolic Interactionist Theory of Fashion
Clothing and Textiles Research Journal,
January 1, 1997;
15(3):
178 - 183.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. B. Kaiser, R. H. Nagasawa, and S. S. Hutton
Truth, Knowledge, New Clothes1 Responses to Hamilton, Kean, and Pannabecker
Clothing and Textiles Research Journal,
January 1, 1997;
15(3):
184 - 191.
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|