|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
Effect of Dress, Cosmetics, Sex of Subject, and Causal Inference on Attribution of Victim Responsibility1
LaCinda Lewis
Department of Home Economics, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85257
Kim K.P. Johnson
School of Human Resource Management, University of North Texas, Denton, TX 76203
This study investigated the influence of dress, cosmetics, sex of subject, and causal inference on attribution of a rape victim's responsibility. Six hundred ten university students served as subjects. Each subject received a questionnaire with a photograph attached, a vignette of a bogus rape victim and a responsibility scale. Data were analyzed using analysis of variance and the Neuman-Keul's test. Results indicated that both dress and causal inference exerted a significant influence on subject's attribution of victim responsibility. Subjects attributed more responsibility for the rape to victims appearing in the most provocative dress than those victims appearing in provocative or least provocative dress. Those subjects who indicated they believed victim ability or effort may have contributed to the rape attributed more responsibility to the victim than those individuals who indicated the situation or chance contributed to the rape. Results are discussed in terms of attribution theory.
Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, Vol. 8, No. 1,
22-27 (1989)
DOI: 10.1177/0887302X8900800103

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. Mitchell, D.J. Angelone, B. Kohlberger, and R. Hirschman
Effects of Offender Motivation, Victim Gender, and Participant Gender on Perceptions of Rape Victims and Offenders
J Interpers Violence,
September 1, 2009;
24(9):
1564 - 1578.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. Park and S. J. Lennon
Beyond Physical Attractiveness: Interpersonal Attraction as a Function of Similarities in Personal Characteristics
Clothing and Textiles Research Journal,
October 1, 2008;
26(4):
275 - 289.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. C. Hipple
Clothing their Resistance in Hegemonic Dress: The Clothesline Project's Response to Violence Against Women
Clothing and Textiles Research Journal,
January 1, 2000;
18(3):
163 - 177.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. J. Lennon, K. K. P. Johnson, and T. L. Schulz
Forging Linkages between Dress and Law in the U.S., Part I: Rape and Sexual Harassment
Clothing and Textiles Research Journal,
January 1, 1999;
17(3):
144 - 156.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. J. Lennon, L. D. Burns, and K. L. Rowold
Dress1 and Human Behavior Research: Sampling, Subjects, and Consequences for Statistics
Clothing and Textiles Research Journal,
January 1, 1995;
13(4):
262 - 272.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. D. Burns and S. J. Lennon
Effect of Clothing on the Use of Person Information Categories in First Impressions
Clothing and Textiles Research Journal,
September 1, 1993;
12(1):
9 - 15.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|
|