|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
Attire, Physical Appearance, and First Impressions: More Is Less
Sharron J. Lennon
Department of Home Economics, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405
Franklin G. Miller
South Central Community Health Center, Bloomington, Indiana 47401
The present research modeled research on trait descriptive adjectives (Anderson, 1968, 1971, 1974, 1979; Zanna and Hamilton, 1972) and examined the manner in which the impact of a target physical appearance cue changes as a function of the number and type of other identifiable physical appearance cues available. In a procedure similar to that used by Zanna and Hamilton (1972), subjects viewed and rated 16 slides of stimulus persons, each of which varied in physical appearance. The 16 slides were developed from a factorial combination of four specific physical appearance cues identified in terms of deviations from a standard. Three separate experiments were conducted. The physical appearance cues were categorized into two types according to whether they were relevant for social situations or task-related situations. A 25 factorial design was used with repeated measurements on each factor. In accord with the basic theory, it was hypothesized that the impact of a single physical appearance cue will be affected by the presence or absence of other such cues.
An analysis of variance was conducted and results of the statistical analysis supported the hypothesis. The impact of any one cue was found to decrease in the presence of similar cues but was found to increase in the presence of dissimilar cues. These results imply that a given cue will have diminishing impact on first impressions when presented with similar cues but will have an increasing impact on first impressions when presented with dissimilar cues.
Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, Vol. 3, No. 1,
1-8 (1984)
DOI: 10.1177/0887302X8400300101

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. J. Lennon and L. D. Burns
Diversity of Research in Textiles, Clothing, and Human Behavior: The Relationship Between What We Know and How We Know
Clothing and Textiles Research Journal,
January 1, 2000;
18(4):
213 - 226.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. J. Lennon, L. D. Burns, and K. L. Rowold
Dress1 and Human Behavior Research: Sampling, Subjects, and Consequences for Statistics
Clothing and Textiles Research Journal,
January 1, 1995;
13(4):
262 - 272.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. K. Lyon and G. O'Neal
A Theoretical Framework for Clothing Awareness
Clothing and Textiles Research Journal,
January 1, 1994;
12(2):
32 - 37.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. U. Behling and E. A. Williams
Influence of Dress on Perception of Intelligence and Expectations of Scholastic Achievement
Clothing and Textiles Research Journal,
June 1, 1991;
9(4):
1 - 7.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. A. Christman and D. H. Branson
Influence of Physical Disability and Dress of Female Job Applicants on Interviewers
Clothing and Textiles Research Journal,
March 1, 1990;
8(3):
51 - 57.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. J. Lennon and L. L. Davis
Clothing and Human Behavior from a Social Cognitive Framework Part I: Theoretical Perspectives
Clothing and Textiles Research Journal,
June 1, 1989;
7(4):
41 - 48.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. B. Kaiser
Clothing and the Social Organization of Gender Perception: A Developmental Approach
Clothing and Textiles Research Journal,
January 1, 1989;
7(2):
46 - 56.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. L. Paek
Effect of Garment Style on the Perception of Personal Traits
Clothing and Textiles Research Journal,
September 1, 1986;
5(1):
10 - 16.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|
|