Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Clothing and Textiles Research Journal
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
0887302X08327086v1
27/4/259    most recent
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ko, E.
Right arrow Articles by Yun, H.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Comparative Analysis of Purchase Intentions Toward Smart Clothing Between Korean and U.S. Consumers

Eunju Ko

Yonsei University, Seoul, Korea

Heewon Sung

Gyeongsang National University, Jinju, Korea

Hyelim Yun

Yonsei University, Seoul, Korea

To examine perceived risks and attributes of smart clothing and how they influence attitudes and purchase intentions toward smart clothing, this study compares 300 Korean and 311 American purchasers to find any differences in the innovation-decision process. Analysis of the data indicates that perceived attributes are identifiable as relative advantage/compatibility and complexity factors. The most significant predictor explaining product attitude and purchase intention across the two countries is relative advantage/compatibility, whereas complexity is only significant in predicting attitude toward smart clothing in the U.S. model. Perceived risks among Koreans are generated into psycho/social, economic, time loss, and performance. Americans present five factors, with psychological and social risk dimensions being separate. Psychological and/or social risk and economic risk take on significant roles in explaining relative advantage, whereas different dimensions of perceived risks are associated with complexity across the two nations.These findings imply different marketing strategies for each cultural group.

Key Words: innovation-decision process • purchase intention • perceived attributes • perceived risks • smart clothing

This version was published on October 1, 2009

Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, Vol. 27, No. 4, 259-273 (2009)
DOI: 10.1177/0887302X08327086
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?