Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Clothing and Textiles Research Journal
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ha, S.
Right arrow Articles by Lennon, S. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Purchase Intent for Fashion Counterfeit Products: Ethical Ideologies, Ethical Judgments, and Perceived Risks

Sejin Ha

The Ohio State University

Sharron J. Lennon

University of Delaware

In two studies ethical ideologies, ethical judgments, perceived risk, and purchase intent associated with fashion counterfeit products were examined. Study 1 (N= 115) found that one perceived risk factor (general uncertainty about consequences) influenced intent to purchase fashion counterfeit items, but ethical ideologies did not. Incorporating ethical judgments, Study 2 (N= 326) found that one of the risk dimensions (general uncertainty about consequences) was significantly related to intent to purchase fashion counterfeit products. In addition, consumers' relativism positively predicted ethical judgments regarding purchasing fashion counterfeit products, whereas idealism did not. Consumers' ethical judgments regarding fashion counterfeit products negatively influenced purchase intent for fashion counterfeit products. The purchase and ownership of fashion counterfeit products were fairly common. The findings of these exploratory studies can be used in the development of course lectures and activities, as well as strategies to offset fashion counterfeiting purchasing.

Key Words: Fashion Counterfeits Shopping • Ethical Ideologies • Ethical Judgments • Perceived Risk • Purchase Intention

Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, Vol. 24, No. 4, 297-315 (2006)
DOI: 10.1177/0887302X06293068


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Clothing and Textiles Research JournalHome page
J.-E. Kim, Hyeon Jeong Cho, and K. K. P. Johnson
Influence of Moral Affect, Judgment, and Intensity on Decision Making Concerning Counterfeit, Gray-Market, and Imitation Products
Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, July 1, 2009; 27(3): 211 - 226.
[Abstract] [PDF]