This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Marcketti, S. B. Articles by Parsons, J. L. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Design Piracy and Self-Regulation: The Fashion Originators' Guild of America, 1932-1941

Jean L. Parsons

Iowa State University

The concept of copying or "knocking off" another designer's idea is an accepted practice in the apparel industry. Legally, designers and manufacturers have had tenuous success in proving their work "original and novel" as required by U.S. patent laws, and copyright laws often do not apply to apparel. The speed of fashion change and reliance on repetition of ideas at various price points makes design protection difficult and controversial. Historically, arguments for and against measures to control copying of apparel most frequently divided along price lines. The Fashion Originators' Guild of America (FOGA, 1932-1941) developed one of the more successful attempts to control design piracy in the dress industry. This article examines the ethical, economic, and social considerations in arguments for and against design protection and analyzes the role of designers, manufacturers, retailers, and consumers in the initial success and ultimately the failure of the FOGA.

Key Words: Apparel Design • Copyright • Design Piracy • Fashion Originators' Guild of America • Knockoff

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?