This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Schofield, N. A. Articles by LaBat, K. L. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Defining and Testing the Assumptions Used in Current Apparel Grading Practice

Technology Department, 331 Fryklund Hall, University of Wisconsin-Stout, Menomonie, WI 54751

Karen L. LaBat

University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN 55108

Grading is the process used to create sized patterns. Our research continues from the finding that grading practice is not based on anthropometric data (Schofield & LaBat, 2005). The focus of this research was to establish proportional rules, set increments, and assumptions that form the basis of grading. The grade rules for a basic bodice pattern from 17 sources were examined to identify grading practice. Seven grading assumptions were identified and tested using regression analysis on body measurements of the upper torso from the 1988 Anthropometric Survey of U.S. Army Women. None of the assumptions were supported. Use of these assumptions results in sized garments that do not reflect the measurements and proportions of the human body. A comparison was made between a pattern graded with traditional grade rules and another graded with research generated experimental rules. New criteria for evaluating graded patterns are presented.

Key Words: Anthropometry • Apparel Sizing • Clothing • Pattern Grading

Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, Vol. 23, No. 3, 135-150 (2005)
DOI: 10.1177/0887302X0502300301


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?