Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Clothing and Textiles Research Journal
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kim, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Rucker, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Production Sourcing Strategies in the U.S. Apparel Industry: A Modified Transaction Cost Approach

Yongju Kim

Department of Fashion Design, Hansung University, Samsun-dong, Sung buk-hu, Seoul, Korea

Margaret Rucker

Division of Textiles and Clothing, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, mhrucker{at}ucdavis.edu

Choices regarding where and how a company's production will take place can significantly impact that company's market performance. To determine significant influences on sourcing strategies in the U.S. apparel industry, a modified transaction cost approach was used, including predictors such as production costs in addition to transaction cost measures. Survey data from 82 U.S. apparel manufacturers were analyzed using logistic regression. Significant predictors of a company's decision to engage in domestic production only versus domestic and offshore production were (a) the size of the company and (b) perceived flexibility of U.S. production. Significant predictors of the proportion of a company's offshore production were (a) the company's foreign business experience, (b) the perception that the company's products are sensitive to fashion change, and (c) perceived flexibility of offshore production. The only significant predictor of decisions to make (use inside production), buy (use outside production), or both was the perceived fashionability of the products.

Key Words: Production Sourcing Strategies • Transaction Cost Analysis • U.S. Apparel Industry

Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, Vol. 23, No. 1, 1-12 (2005)
DOI: 10.1177/0887302X0502300101


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Clothing and Textiles Research JournalHome page
J. Su, C. L. Dyer, and V. B. Gargeya
Strategic Sourcing and Supplier Selection in the U.S. Textile-- Apparel--Retail Supply Network
Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, April 1, 2009; 27(2): 83 - 97.
[Abstract] [PDF]