Clothing and Textiles Research Journal

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Johnson, K. K. P.
Right arrow Articles by Yurchisin, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, Vol. 20, No. 3, 125-137 (2002)
DOI: 10.1177/0887302X0202000301

Appearance and Dress as a Source of Information: A Qualitative Approach to Data Collection

Kim K. P. Johnson

240 McNeal Hall, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN 55108-6136

Nancy A. Schofield

Division of Technology, University of Wisconsin - Stout, Menomonie, WI 54751

Jennifer Yurchisin

240 McNeal Hall, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN 55108-6136

A content analysis of 39 women’s responses to open-ended interview questions revealed a) what impressions they formed of others based on appearance and dress, as well as what cues they chose, and b) that they believed that others also used appearance and dress cues when forming impressions of them. Neither participants’ impressions of others nor participants’ beliefs regarding others’ impressions of them contained information that extended beyond the perceived person to include other people or things associated with the perceived person. Instead, the content of the information inferred included personality characteristics, information about behaviors, biological traits, health and hygiene, and social roles. Most participants believed that both they and others were accurate at decoding information from general appearance and dress cues, although some participants believed that accuracy was dependent upon the situation or related to specific appearance or dress cues.

Key Words: appearance • communication • dress • social perception


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Clothing and Textiles Research JournalHome page
K. K. P. Johnson, J.-J. Yoo, M. Kim, and S. J. Lennon
Dress and Human Behavior: A Review and Critique
Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, January 1, 2008; 26(1): 3 - 22.
[Abstract] [PDF]