Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Clothing and Textiles Research Journal
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hamilton, J. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

The Macro-Micro Interface in the Construction of Individual Fashion Forms and Meanings

Jean A. Hamilton

Department of Textiles and Apparel Management, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65211

This paper is written in response to Kaiser, Nagasawa, and Hutton's (1995) reliance on symbolic interactionism in an effort to develop a bridge between micro and macro level phenomena to explain how individual fashion consumers come to accept new appearance styles and attach meaning to them. By examining the macro-micro distinction in the social sciences suggested by Ritzer (1990), I argue that symbolic interactionism cannot possibly facilitate these goals. I then use Ritzer to develop a heuristic model of macro-micro level phenomena that influence the way fashion consumers attach meaning to fashion forms and appearances. My primary concern in this paper is with macro-level phenomena, which includes cultural-system arbiters that, in turn, influence fashion-system arbiters. I argue that these two categories of macro-level phenomena then influence micro-level phenomena, including the negotiation of meanings among individuals, although influence between macro and micro levels is not unidirectional, and the more micro-level phenomenon of self-negotiation is a process whereby individuals ascribe meaning to fashion. Finally, I call for the systematic exploration of levels of analysis in assessing existing fashion theory to discover areas of scholarship that remain neglected.

Key Words: Key Words: fashion • theory • culture • meaning.

Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, Vol. 15, No. 3, 164-171 (1997)
DOI: 10.1177/0887302X9701500306
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Clothing and Textiles Research JournalHome page
E. L. Pedersen
Theory Is Everywhere: A Discourse on Theory
Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, January 1, 2007; 25(1): 106 - 128.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Clothing and Textiles Research JournalHome page
A. M. Fiore and J. P. Ogle
Facilitating Students' Integration of Textiles and Clothing Subject Matter Part One: Dimensions of a Model and a Taxonomy
Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, January 1, 2000; 18(1): 31 - 45.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Clothing and Textiles Research JournalHome page
S. B. Kaiser, R. H. Nagasawa, and S. S. Hutton
Truth, Knowledge, New Clothes1 Responses to Hamilton, Kean, and Pannabecker
Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, January 1, 1997; 15(3): 184 - 191.
[PDF]