Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Clothing and Textiles Research Journal
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Feather, B. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Challenges of the 1990s: Clothing and Textiles Enrollment Trends and Program Issues

Betty L. Feather

Department of Clothing and Textiles, University of North Carolina, Greensboro, NC 27412-5001

Major changes are occurring in higher education. Clothing and textiles programs with origins in home economics face many challenges as they move into the 21st century. The three purposes of this study were (1) to examine enrollment patterns, staffing and department configurations; (2) to ascertain the extent of departments' involvement in recruitment and enrichment or improvement activities, and perception of environmental conditions affecting programs; and (3) to test hypotheses concerning potential differences between large and small programs for recruitment, enrichment or improvement and environmental conditions. One questionnaire was mailed to the administrator of every department (234) with faculty who were members of the International Textile and Apparel Association (ITAA) in the United States, 160 administrators provided usable responses. Seventy percent of the administrators indicated their departments were multidisciplinary. Small programs, fewer than six faculty, constituted seventy percent of the sample used in the analysis. MANOVA and Hotelling's T2 procedures identified differences between large and small programs for recruitment (F(10, 119) = 1.86, p < .05), with large programs indicating greater recruitment activities. The other two hypotheses approached significance by program size for enrichment or improvement activities (F(10,128) = 1.71, p = .08) and perceptions of environmental conditions (F(12,119) = 1. 73, p = .07). Conclusions and implications focus on critical issues and concerns.

Key Words: enrollment • clothing programs • recruitment

Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, Vol. 14, No. 4, 234-241 (1996)
DOI: 10.1177/0887302X9601400402


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Clothing and Textiles Research JournalHome page
E. Goldsberry, K. C. Gehrt, H. Sun, and S. Shim
Career Preference for Retail Formats Among College Students: A Socialization Perspective
Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, January 1, 1999; 17(1): 36 - 46.
[Abstract] [PDF]