Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Clothing and Textiles Research Journal
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Workman, J. E.
Right arrow Articles by Johnson, K. K. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Fashion Opinion Leadership, Fashion Innovativeness, and Need for Variety

Jane E. Workman

Department of Vocational Education Studies, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, IL 62901-4318

Kim K. P. Johnson

Department of Design, Housing and Apparel, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN 55108

The purpose of this study was to identify the relationship between need for variety and four consumer groups: fashion opinion leaders, fashion innovators, innovative communicators, and fashion followers. We predicted that fashion opinion leaders, fashion innovators, and innovative communicators would have a greater need for variety than would fashion followers. Subjects were 425 undergraduate students. Hirschman and Adcock's Measurement of Innovativeness and Opinion Leadership was used to identify the four consumer groups. Need for variety was measured by the Sensation Seeking Scale. Data were analyzed using analysis of variance and the Student-Newman-Keuls test. Results indicated that there was a significant difference between fashion innovators and fashion followers on need for variety as measured by the experience seeking component of the Sensation Seeking Scale. There were no significant differences between fashion opinion leaders or innovative communicators and fashion followers on the Sensation Seeking Scale. Results suggest that part of the psychological makeup of fashion innovators is a greater need for variety in the form of mental stimulation than fashion followers possess.

Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, Vol. 11, No. 3, 60-64 (1993)
DOI: 10.1177/0887302X9301100309


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Family and Consumer Sciences Research JournalHome page
D. Shen, S. Lennon, M. A. Dickson, C. Montalto, and L. Zhang
Chinese Consumers' Attitudes Toward U.S.- and PRC-Made Clothing: From a Cultural Perspective
Family and Consumer Sciences Research Journal, September 1, 2002; 31(1): 19 - 49.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Clothing and Textiles Research JournalHome page
J. E. Workman and L. K. Kidd
Use of the Need for Uniqueness Scale to Characterize Fashion Consumer Groups
Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, January 1, 2000; 18(4): 227 - 236.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Clothing and Textiles Research JournalHome page
R. E. Goldsmith, L. R. Flynn, and M. A. Moore
The Self-Concept of Fashion Leaders
Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, January 1, 1996; 14(4): 242 - 248.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Clothing and Textiles Research JournalHome page
Y.-H. Kwon and J. E. Workman
Relationship of Optimum Stimulation Level to Fashion Behavior
Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, January 1, 1996; 14(4): 249 - 256.
[Abstract] [PDF]